hacks.mozilla.org

This demo is from our good friend Ryan Seddon who came up with a demo that seems deeply appropriate for this week, given our focus on the future of fonts on the web.

If you’ve ever been editing a page and wanted to know what a particular font looked like without having to upload files to a web server and update CSS (so tedious, that!) then this demo is for you.

He’s come up with a demo that shows what’s possible when you’ve got downloadable fonts, drag and drop and editable content. (If you want to know more about drag and drop we suggest you read his excellent overview of using drag and drop to do file uploading.)

From Ryan’s description:

Font dragr is an experimental web app that uses HTML5 & CSS3 to create a useful standalone web based application for testing custom fonts, once you visit it for the first time you don’t need to be online to use it after the initial visit. It allows you, in Firefox 3.6+, to drag and drop font files from your file system into the drop area. The browser will then create a data URL encoded copy to use in the page and render the content in the dropped font.

You can either read the full description, which contains a lot of useful technical information about how the demo works, or you can view the demo below. Either way, it’s nice to see the excellent HTML5 support in Firefox 3.6 coming together with everything else we’ve added to bring a lot of new capabilities to web developers and users.

Thanks, Ryan!

Note: the discussion below applies to work in progress that might show up in Firefox 3.7. It does not describe features in Firefox 3.6.

This post is from Jonathan Kew and John Daggett. He’s supplied a 5 minute video that shows some of the features on the fly. If you’re a total font nerd and you enjoy a soothing British accent, you might want to watch it.

Using @font-face allows web designers a wide palette of font choices and with commercial font vendors supporting the WOFF font format, the set of font choices should improve even more. So the next step is clearly to try and make better use of features available in these fonts.

For many years, “smart” font formats such as OpenType and AAT have provided font designers ways of including a rich set of variations in their fonts, from ligatures and swashes to small caps and tabular figures. The OpenType specification describes these features, identifying each with a unique feature tag. But these have typically only been available to those using professional publishing applications such as Adobe InDesign. Firefox currently renders using font defaults; it would be much more interesting to provide web authors with a way of controlling these font features via CSS.

Håkon Wium Lie of Opera, based on discussions with Tal Leming and Adam Twardoch, proposed extending the CSS ‘font-variant’ property to include values for font features. Mozilla is actively working on a new proposal along these lines. This is a fairly big addition to CSS, so it will most likely involve some complex discussions about how best to support these features.

Experimental Implementation

As part of this effort, Jonathan Kew has been working on porting a portion of the Pango library for use with handling complex scripts and to enable the use of font features on all supported platforms. He currently has an experimental build that uses a special CSS property to associate a list of OpenType features with specific elements in a page. This is not the proposed format, it simply provides a better way of discussing possible sets of font-variant properties and the OpenType feature settings to which they should map.

.altstyles {
  /* format: feature-tag=[0,1] with 0 to disable, 1 to enable */
  -moz-font-feature-opentype: "dlig=1,ss01=1";
}

The feature setting string above implies rendering with discretionary ligatures (dlig) and the first set of stylistic alternates (ss01). An example using Jack Usine’s MEgalopolis Extra:

This font makes extensive use of OpenType features; the homepage of the font contains a sample rendering that uses many of these features. Below is a rendering of the same sample written in HTML with OpenType features enabled:

Tabular Figures for Numerical Alignment

OpenType features also enable better control over alignment. When numbers are listed in tabular form, proportional forms often result in the misalignment of digits across rows, making the list harder to scan. With tabular alignment enabled, individual digits are rendered using a fixed width so that digits align across rows:

Automatic Fractions

Automatic fractions are also possible with OpenType features, note the inline use of fractional forms in the recipe ingredient list below:

Language Sensitivity

OpenType also includes support for features on a per-language basis. This is important for rendering text correctly in some languages. For example, Turkish uses both a dotted-i and a dotless-i, so the distinction needs to be preserved when rendering ligatures or small caps. Below is the same text in English and Turkish, with both default and language-sensitive renderings shown for the Turkish text:

Historical Text

The way text is rendered constantly evolves; glyphs once in common use often morph into other forms, making the historical forms distinct from their modern forms. Below is the text of an old Massachusetts Bay Colony law, taken from a book in the Daniel R. Coquillette Rare Book Room of the Boston College Law Library.

Original scanned image:

Below is the same text rendered in HTML using the Fell Types revival fonts by Igino Marini with OpenType features enabled. Note the ‘ct’ ligature and the contextual form of the ‘s’:

More resources

Font feature support in CSS proposal
OpenType font feature list
Fell Types revival fonts by Igino Marini

This article was written by John Daggett. John is a Mozilla contributor and has been working hard with font creators and web developers to improve the state of fonts on the web. This article is a high-level overview of whats different and shows some examples of WOFF in use. A full list of other supporting organizations can be found at the official Mozilla Blog.

In Firefox 3.5 we included support for linking to TrueType and OpenType fonts. In Firefox 3.6 we’re including support for a new font format – the Web Open Font Format, or WOFF. This format has two main advantages over raw TrueType or OpenType fonts.

1. It is compressed, which means that you will typically see much smaller download sizes compared with raw TrueType or OpenType fonts.
2. It contains information that allows you to see where the font came from – without DRM or labeling for a specific domain – which means it has support from a large number of font creators and font foundries.

The WOFF format originated from a collabaration between the font designers Erik van Blokland and Tal Leming with help from Mozilla’s Jonathan Kew. Each had proposed their own format and WOFF represents a melding of these different proposals. The format itself is intended to be a simple repackaging of OpenType or TrueType font data, it doesn’t introduce any new behavior, alter the @font-face linking mechanism or affect the way fonts are rendered. Many font vendors have expressed support for this new format so the hope is this will open up a wider range of font options for web designers.

Details on Differences between TrueType, OpenType and WOFF

First, compression is part of the WOFF format so web authors can optimize the size of fonts used on their pages. The compression format is lossless, the uncompressed font data will match that of the original OpenType or TrueType font, so the way the font renders will be the same as the original. Similar compression can be achieved using general HTTP compression but because compression is part of the WOFF format, it’s simpler for authors to use, especially in situations where access to server configuration is not possible.

Second, the format includes optional metadata so that a font vendor can tag their fonts with information related to font usage. This metadata doesn’t affect how fonts are loaded but tools can use this information to identify the source of a given font, so that those interested in the design of a given page can track down the fonts used on that page. Fonts in WOFF format are compressed but are not encrypted, the format should not be viewed as a “secure” format by those looking for a mechanism to strictly regulate and control font use.

Note: until Firefox 3.6 ships, users can test the use of WOFF fonts with Firefox nightly builds.

Examples

Below is a simple example that shows how to construct an @font-face rule that links to a WOFF font. To support browsers that only support direct linking to OpenType and TrueType fonts, the ’src’ descriptor lists the WOFF font first along with a format hint (”woff”), followed by the TrueType version:

/* Gentium (SIL International) */
 
@font-face {
  font-family: GentiumTest;
  src: url(fonts/GenR102.woff) format("woff"),
       url(fonts/GenR102.ttf) format("truetype");
}
 
body {
  font-family: GentiumTest, Times, Times New Roman, serif;
}

Structured this way, browsers that support the WOFF format will download the WOFF file. Other browsers that support @font-face but don’t yet support the WOFF format will use the TrueType version. (Note: IE support is a bit trickier, as discussed below).　As WOFF is adopted more widely the need to include links to multiple font formats will diminish.

Other examples below demostrate the use of WOFF formatted fonts but each example has been constructed so that it will work in any browser that supports @font-face, including Internet Explorer.

A font family with multiple faces

Using a Postscript CFF font

African Language Display

Below is an example of how downloadable fonts can be used to render languages for which font support is usually lacking. The example shows the UN Declaration of Human Rights, translated into two African languages, and how these render with default browser fonts vs. with a downloadable font suited for rendering these languages.

Note that in one of these examples that the font size goes from a 3.1MB TTF to a 1MB WOFF font and in the other from a 172KB TTF to an 80KB WOFF file.

Another Postscript CFF font

An example in Japanese

Working With Other Browsers

Firefox 3.6 will be the first shipping browser to support the WOFF format so it’s important to construct @font-face rules that work with browsers lacking WOFF support. One thing that helps greatly with this is the use of format hints to indicate the format of font data before it’s downloaded; browsers that don’t recognize a given format simply skip data in a format they don’t support.

Internet Explorer, including IE8, only supports the EOT font format and only implements a subset of the @font-face rule descriptors. This makes creating cross-platform @font-face rules that work with IE especially tricky. One solution is to make different rules for IE:

@font-face {
  font-family: GentiumTest;
  src: url(fonts/GenR102.eot);  /* for IE */
}
 
@font-face {
  font-family: GentiumTest;
  /* Works only in WOFF-enabled browsers */
  src: url(fonts/GenR102.woff) format("woff"); 
}

One minor downside of this is that IE doesn’t understand format hints and doesn’t parse @font-face URL’s correctly, it treats format hints as part of the URL, so web authors using the @font-face rules above will see the following in their access logs:

GET /fonts/GenR102.eot HTTP/1.1" 200 303536
GET /fonts/GenR102.woff)%20format(%22woff%22) HTTP/1.1" 404 335

IE successfully pulls down and uses the EOT version of the font but also tries to pull down the WOFF font with the format hint included in the URL. This fails and doesn’t affecting page rendering but it wastes valuable server resources. For more discussion, see Paul Irish’s blog post for one interesting workaround.

Another problem is that IE currently tries to download all fonts on the page, whether they are used or not. That makes site-wide stylesheets containing all fonts used on site pages difficult, since IE will always try to download all fonts defined in @font-face rules, wasting lots of server bandwidth.

Further Resources

Documentation

Latest draft WOFF specification
Original blog post on using @font-face
CSS3 Fonts working draft
MDC @font-face documentation

Tools

Jonathan Kew’s sample encoding/decoding code
woffTools – tools for examining and validating WOFF files
FontTools/TTX – Python library and tool for manipulating font data
Web-based font subsetting tool

General @font-face Examples

CSS @ Ten: The Next Big Thing
Example layout using Graublau Sans
Examples of Interesting Web Typography
The Elements of Typographic Style Applied to the Web

Font Resources

Font Squirrel
10 Great Free Fonts for @font-face
40 Excellent Free Fonts by Smashing Magazine

We’ve just launched Firefox 3.5, and we’re incredibly proud. Naturally, we have engaged in plentiful Mozilla advocacy — this site is, amongst other things, a vehicle for showcasing the latest browser’s new capabilities. We like to think about this release as an upgrade for the whole World Wide Web, because of the new developer-facing features that have just been introduced into the web platform. When talking about some of the next generation standards, the appearance of the number “5″ is almost uncanny — consider HTML5 and ECMAScript 5 (PDF). The recent (and very welcome) hype around HTML5 in the press is what motivates this article. Let’s take a step back, and consider some of Mozilla’s web advocacy in the context of events leading up to the release of Firefox 3.5.

Standardization of many of these features often came after much spirited discussion, and we’re pleased to see the prominent placement of HTML5 as a key strategic initiative by major web development companies. Indeed, exciting new web applications hold a great deal of promise, and really showcase what the future of the web platform holds in store for aspiring developers. Many herald the triumphant arrival of the browser as the computer, an old theme that gets bolstered with the arrival of attractive HTML5 platform features that are implemented across Safari, Chrome, Opera, and of course, Firefox (with IE8 getting an honorable mention for having both some HTML5 features and some ECMAScript, 5th Edition features).

Call it what you will — Web 5.0, Open Web 5th Generation (wince!), or, (R)evolution # 5, the future is now. But lest anyone forget, HTML5 is not a completed standard yet, as the W3C was quick to point out. The editor doesn’t anticipate completion till 2010. The path taken from the start of what is now called HTML5 to the present-day era of (very welcome) hype has been a long one, and Mozilla has been part of the journey from the very beginning.

For one thing, we were there to point out, in no uncertain terms, that the W3C had perhaps lost its way. Exactly 5 summers ago (again, with that magic number!), it became evident that the W3C was no longer able to serve as sole custodian of the standards governing the open web of browser-based applications, so Mozilla, along with Opera, started the WHATWG. Of course, back then, we didn’t call it HTML5, and while Firefox itself made a splash in 2004, the steps taken towards standardization were definitive but tentative. Soon, other browser vendors joined us, and by the time the reconciliation with W3C occurred two years later, the innovations introduced into the web platform via the movement initiated by Mozilla had gained substantial momentum.

The net result is a specification that is not yet complete called “HTML5″ which is implemented piecemeal by most modern browsers. The features we choose to implement as an industry are in response to developers, and our modus operandi is (for the most part) in the open. Mozilla funds the HTML5 Validator, producing the first real HTML5 parser, which now drives W3C’s markup validation for HTML5. That parser has made its way back into Firefox. It’s important to note that capabilities that are of greatest interest (many of which are showcased on this blog) are not only developed within the HTML5 specification, but also as part of the W3C Geolocation WG, the Web Apps WG, and the CSS WG.

The release of Firefox 3.5, along with updates to other modern browsers, seems to declare that HTML5 has arrived. But with the foresight that comes with having been around this for a while, we also know that we have a lot of work ahead of us. For one thing, we’ve got to finish HTML5, or at least publish a subset of it that we all agree is ready for implementation, soon. We’ve also got to ensure that accessibility serves as an important design principle in the emerging web platform, and resolve sticky differences here. Also, an open standard does not an open platform make, as debates about web fonts and audio/video codecs show. We’ve got a lot of work ahead of us, but for now, 5 years after the summer we started the ball rolling, we’re enjoying the hype around (R)evolution Number 5.

This post counts as both a demo and commentary about the changing nature of typography on the web. Ian Lynam and Craig Mod have put together a page that is an excellent example of typography in action, but also offer some suggestions on what the next steps for typography on the web might look like. The page itself takes advantage of a number of typefaces that Craig and Ian got permission to use and uses a pleasing multi-column layout. Please click through to the complete article to get the full effect.

View the Demo in Firefox 3.5