<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 3.6 Alpha 1 &#8211; web developer changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/</link>
	<description>hacks.mozilla.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primera versión del Firefox 3.6</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-2/#comment-538461</link>
		<dc:creator>Primera versión del Firefox 3.6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-538461</guid>
		<description>[...] su nuevo navegador en fase de desarrollo, Firefox 3.6. Tal y como ha afirmado Chris Blizzard en el blog de la compañía, el desarrollo de esta nueva versión no va a ser tan largo como el de la versión Firefox 3.5, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] su nuevo navegador en fase de desarrollo, Firefox 3.6. Tal y como ha afirmado Chris Blizzard en el blog de la compañía, el desarrollo de esta nueva versión no va a ser tan largo como el de la versión Firefox 3.5, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fire fox 3.6a發佈 最快的Fire fox</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-2/#comment-372341</link>
		<dc:creator>Fire fox 3.6a發佈 最快的Fire fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-372341</guid>
		<description>[...] Mozilla一篇部落格文章指出，Firefox 3.6主要的焦點將放在終端用戶使用上的滿意度，我們發現這款新版本較目前的版本Firefox 3.5快上10%。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mozilla一篇部落格文章指出，Firefox 3.6主要的焦點將放在終端用戶使用上的滿意度，我們發現這款新版本較目前的版本Firefox 3.5快上10%。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirk</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-52051</link>
		<dc:creator>dirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-52051</guid>
		<description>no, still no 64-bit tracemonkey support i guess. Just as previous versions, firefox 3.6 still lags. I ran the V8 and Sunspider benchmark and saw the same slow figures for 3.6. It seems that it is now supported in the 3.7 development version: it is 2x faster in those benchmarks (~1500 vs. ~3500ms in sunspider). Of course Chrome is king and is 5-10x faster as 3.6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, still no 64-bit tracemonkey support i guess. Just as previous versions, firefox 3.6 still lags. I ran the V8 and Sunspider benchmark and saw the same slow figures for 3.6. It seems that it is now supported in the 3.7 development version: it is 2x faster in those benchmarks (~1500 vs. ~3500ms in sunspider). Of course Chrome is king and is 5-10x faster as 3.6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lifeis &#187; Mozilla Shows What’s to Come in Firefox 3.6 Alpha Release</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-6986</link>
		<dc:creator>lifeis &#187; Mozilla Shows What’s to Come in Firefox 3.6 Alpha Release</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-6986</guid>
		<description>[...] Firefox 3.5, we expect that this 3.6 release will be released in a small number of months,&#8221; writes Mozilla&#8217;s Chris Blizzard in a recent blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Firefox 3.5, we expect that this 3.6 release will be released in a small number of months,&#8221; writes Mozilla&#8217;s Chris Blizzard in a recent blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-4678</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-4678</guid>
		<description>drago01, you could just look at the bug report...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drago01, you could just look at the bug report&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drago01</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3376</link>
		<dc:creator>drago01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3376</guid>
		<description>&quot;The TraceMonkey JavaScript engine has continued to get faster.&quot;

Does it finally have x86_64 support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The TraceMonkey JavaScript engine has continued to get faster.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does it finally have x86_64 support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla issues first Firefox 3.6 alpha version &#171; Blossom Nike Dunk SB Shoes Blog</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3372</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla issues first Firefox 3.6 alpha version &#171; Blossom Nike Dunk SB Shoes Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3372</guid>
		<description>[...] that this 3.6 release will be released in a small number of months,&#8221; Mozilla evangelist Chris Blizzard said in a blog post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that this 3.6 release will be released in a small number of months,&#8221; Mozilla evangelist Chris Blizzard said in a blog post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. A. Sridhar</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3367</link>
		<dc:creator>M. A. Sridhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3367</guid>
		<description>The hashchange event seems very useful for handling the ajax back button problem. Is it a standard event (as in W3C or whatever) or is it Firefox-specific? Do other browsers support a similar event?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hashchange event seems very useful for handling the ajax back button problem. Is it a standard event (as in W3C or whatever) or is it Firefox-specific? Do other browsers support a similar event?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3.6 Alpha Now Available &#124; Bagoscomp.com</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3357</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3.6 Alpha Now Available &#124; Bagoscomp.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3357</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Unlike the year that passed between Firefox 3 and Firefox 3.5, we expect that this 3.6 release will be released in a small number of months,&#8221; Mozilla evangelist Chris Blizzard said in a blog post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Unlike the year that passed between Firefox 3 and Firefox 3.5, we expect that this 3.6 release will be released in a small number of months,&#8221; Mozilla evangelist Chris Blizzard said in a blog post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axel Rauschmayer</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3343</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel Rauschmayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3343</guid>
		<description>I agree: SVG as images would be cool, it should not matter whether an img is a bitmap or a vector graphic. Under &quot;if your browser rocks&quot;, the following page shows text on Firefox and an image on Safari:
http://e.metaclarity.org/52/cross-browser-svg-issues/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree: SVG as images would be cool, it should not matter whether an img is a bitmap or a vector graphic. Under &#8220;if your browser rocks&#8221;, the following page shows text on Firefox and an image on Safari:<br />
<a href="http://e.metaclarity.org/52/cross-browser-svg-issues/" rel="nofollow">http://e.metaclarity.org/52/cross-browser-svg-issues/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Firefox 3.6 Alpha 1: Lo que nos importa a los desarrolladores : Blogografia</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3329</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Firefox 3.6 Alpha 1: Lo que nos importa a los desarrolladores : Blogografia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3329</guid>
		<description>[...] los desarrolladores, estas versiones Alpha son muy reveladoras ya que se van incorporando nuevas funcionalidades que podremos usar en nuestras aplicaciones y que desde ya podemos ir [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] los desarrolladores, estas versiones Alpha son muy reveladoras ya que se van incorporando nuevas funcionalidades que podremos usar en nuestras aplicaciones y que desde ya podemos ir [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Firefox 3.6 Alpha 1: Lo que nos importa a los desarrolladores &#124; aNieto2K</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3323</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Firefox 3.6 Alpha 1: Lo que nos importa a los desarrolladores &#124; aNieto2K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3323</guid>
		<description>[...] los desarrolladores, estas versiones Alpha son muy reveladoras ya que se van incorporando nuevas funcionalidades que podremos usar en nuestras aplicaciones y que desde ya podemos ir [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] los desarrolladores, estas versiones Alpha son muy reveladoras ya que se van incorporando nuevas funcionalidades que podremos usar en nuestras aplicaciones y que desde ya podemos ir [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voracity</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3318</link>
		<dc:creator>voracity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3318</guid>
		<description>Ah well, I guess I&#039;ll have to wait till 3.7 or 4.0. Plenty of other great things to look forward to in 3.6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah well, I guess I&#8217;ll have to wait till 3.7 or 4.0. Plenty of other great things to look forward to in 3.6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3313</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3313</guid>
		<description>Nice work on the Awesomebar speedups</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work on the Awesomebar speedups</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3303</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3303</guid>
		<description>soso, better in what sense?  What specific features are you thinking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>soso, better in what sense?  What specific features are you thinking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soso</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>soso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>Better SVG Support would be great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better SVG Support would be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox 3.6 Alpha sale al público &#124; InterArtix</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox 3.6 Alpha sale al público &#124; InterArtix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>[...] número de meses”, comentaba Chris Blizzard, uno de los máximos responsables de Firefox, en un post en el blog de la [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] número de meses”, comentaba Chris Blizzard, uno de los máximos responsables de Firefox, en un post en el blog de la [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techknology&#8217;s Blog &#187; Firefox 3.6 Alpha Now Available</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>Techknology&#8217;s Blog &#187; Firefox 3.6 Alpha Now Available</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Unlike the year that passed between Firefox 3 and Firefox 3.5, we expect that this 3.6 release will be released in a small number of months,&#8221; Mozilla evangelist Chris Blizzard said in a blog post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Unlike the year that passed between Firefox 3 and Firefox 3.5, we expect that this 3.6 release will be released in a small number of months,&#8221; Mozilla evangelist Chris Blizzard said in a blog post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mozilla Firefox 3.6 &#171; LIN OPEN SOFTWARE</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3274</link>
		<dc:creator>Mozilla Firefox 3.6 &#171; LIN OPEN SOFTWARE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3274</guid>
		<description>[...] su nuevo navegador en fase de desarrollo, Firefox 3.6. Tal y como ha afirmado Chris Blizzard en el blog de la compañía, el desarrollo de esta nueva versión no va a ser tan largo como el de la versión Firefox 3.5, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] su nuevo navegador en fase de desarrollo, Firefox 3.6. Tal y como ha afirmado Chris Blizzard en el blog de la compañía, el desarrollo de esta nueva versión no va a ser tan largo como el de la versión Firefox 3.5, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Gunn</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/08/firefox-36a1-for-developers/comment-page-1/#comment-3270</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Gunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1546#comment-3270</guid>
		<description>Of the CSS extensions, which are likely to make it into CSS standards in the future? It&#039;s nice to see new features, but I&#039;m not sure it&#039;ll be nice if in five years we find our CSS still peppered with -webkit-* and -moz-* extensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of the CSS extensions, which are likely to make it into CSS standards in the future? It&#8217;s nice to see new features, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;ll be nice if in five years we find our CSS still peppered with -webkit-* and -moz-* extensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

