<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: video &#8211; more than just a tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/</link>
	<description>hacks.mozilla.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hacks.mozilla.org: Fun with new technologies at the Firefox 4 launch party in London &#124; Firefox Latest News</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-498350</link>
		<dc:creator>hacks.mozilla.org: Fun with new technologies at the Firefox 4 launch party in London &#124; Firefox Latest News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-498350</guid>
		<description>[...] You can analyse and manipulate video with Canvas to inject content [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can analyse and manipulate video with Canvas to inject content [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fun with new technologies at the Firefox 4 launch party in London &#10025; Mozilla Hacks &#8211; the Web developer blog</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-498308</link>
		<dc:creator>Fun with new technologies at the Firefox 4 launch party in London &#10025; Mozilla Hacks &#8211; the Web developer blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-498308</guid>
		<description>[...] You can analyse and manipulate video with Canvas to inject content [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can analyse and manipulate video with Canvas to inject content [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfredo</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-267929</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-267929</guid>
		<description>Hello! 

I have searched but I have not found this video option.

Description of situation:
In  a web page.php I have 2 DIVs. 
Insight every DIV there is a video.  
For first time I show Div id=”one” that start in auto play.
I know its duration, so after, for example, 10 seconds I hide its DIV and show the div id=”two”.
I use 2 javascript functions.

Problem:
Some times the video in div id=”one” late to be ready to play, late to start to play, but the count down of 10 seconds is started. So it will be interrupt in (10 – (late)) seconds.
The video may be linked from youtobe or other server in different format as flv, wmv or ogg.

Needed:
How I can understand when the video is start to play, so after this time to start the count down? 
Is there a javascript option that give me a status = &#039;true&#039; where the video started, so I start the count down to change the div?

Thanks!
Alfredo.
Milan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! </p>
<p>I have searched but I have not found this video option.</p>
<p>Description of situation:<br />
In  a web page.php I have 2 DIVs.<br />
Insight every DIV there is a video.<br />
For first time I show Div id=”one” that start in auto play.<br />
I know its duration, so after, for example, 10 seconds I hide its DIV and show the div id=”two”.<br />
I use 2 javascript functions.</p>
<p>Problem:<br />
Some times the video in div id=”one” late to be ready to play, late to start to play, but the count down of 10 seconds is started. So it will be interrupt in (10 – (late)) seconds.<br />
The video may be linked from youtobe or other server in different format as flv, wmv or ogg.</p>
<p>Needed:<br />
How I can understand when the video is start to play, so after this time to start the count down?<br />
Is there a javascript option that give me a status = &#8216;true&#8217; where the video started, so I start the count down to change the div?</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Alfredo.<br />
Milan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Komrade Killjoy</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-103687</link>
		<dc:creator>Komrade Killjoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-103687</guid>
		<description>MPlayer is for video

Firefox is for markup

It is inane to use firefox in lieu of MPlayer 

:P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MPlayer is for video</p>
<p>Firefox is for markup</p>
<p>It is inane to use firefox in lieu of MPlayer </p>
<p>:P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nil&#39;s hidden file&#187; Blog Archive &#187; HTML5 如火如荼进行时</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-51755</link>
		<dc:creator>nil&#39;s hidden file&#187; Blog Archive &#187; HTML5 如火如荼进行时</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-51755</guid>
		<description>[...] 随着 Firefox 版本升级到 3.5，正式支持 HTML5，坊间对该标准的讨论就没停过。其中最显著的，&lt;video&gt;标签，因为对浏览器该支持哪一个视频编码而纠结不休，很是著名。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 随着 Firefox 版本升级到 3.5，正式支持 HTML5，坊间对该标准的讨论就没停过。其中最显著的，&lt;video&gt;标签，因为对浏览器该支持哪一个视频编码而纠结不休，很是著名。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @sull</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1905</link>
		<dc:creator>@sull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1905</guid>
		<description>Vince, 

I see what you mean now.  I misinterpreted.

Lack of Supporting mp4 with the native video tag in FF has to do mostly with licensing, as has been discussed here and elsewhere.  

But honestly, as a developer i don&#039;t think the lack of native mp4 support using the video element adds much complexity to video handling - you could use sometihng like this - http://metavid.org/wiki/Mv_Embed  or do your own browser detection and output accordingly.  it&#039;s no worse than the current state of media embedding. 

And it&#039;s not a developers problem as much as it is a content creators concern... the users of the sites/pages that you build. 
And video content creators typically are used to providing multiple formats for diff platofrms and devices.  Not much changing there either.  Except, I hope... more Ogg media.

Not much of an argument unless you are the ones responsible for the costs involved with integrating h.264... and with Ogg Theora improvements... the cost is not justifued compared to any differences in quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince, </p>
<p>I see what you mean now.  I misinterpreted.</p>
<p>Lack of Supporting mp4 with the native video tag in FF has to do mostly with licensing, as has been discussed here and elsewhere.  </p>
<p>But honestly, as a developer i don&#8217;t think the lack of native mp4 support using the video element adds much complexity to video handling &#8211; you could use sometihng like this &#8211; <a href="http://metavid.org/wiki/Mv_Embed" rel="nofollow">http://metavid.org/wiki/Mv_Embed</a>  or do your own browser detection and output accordingly.  it&#8217;s no worse than the current state of media embedding. </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not a developers problem as much as it is a content creators concern&#8230; the users of the sites/pages that you build.<br />
And video content creators typically are used to providing multiple formats for diff platofrms and devices.  Not much changing there either.  Except, I hope&#8230; more Ogg media.</p>
<p>Not much of an argument unless you are the ones responsible for the costs involved with integrating h.264&#8230; and with Ogg Theora improvements&#8230; the cost is not justifued compared to any differences in quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @sull</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>@sull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>my comment got stripped but regardless... the point i was making is that the video tag can be used for flv or mp4 or other formats, not just ogg media.  specifying an ogg file is not required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my comment got stripped but regardless&#8230; the point i was making is that the video tag can be used for flv or mp4 or other formats, not just ogg media.  specifying an ogg file is not required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @sull</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>@sull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>Vince-


     
     
     


is how you could provide 3 formats.  but you can also just provide whichever format you want and ignore others.


     


having a default codec does not cause a developer to have more problems.  however, having a default codec does help a content creator have more assurance that a video can be played by modern browsers regardless of extra plugins (that need to be properly updated with various codecs).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince-</p>
<p>is how you could provide 3 formats.  but you can also just provide whichever format you want and ignore others.</p>
<p>having a default codec does not cause a developer to have more problems.  however, having a default codec does help a content creator have more assurance that a video can be played by modern browsers regardless of extra plugins (that need to be properly updated with various codecs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1767</guid>
		<description>Why can&#039;t you just provide support for BOTH Mpeg4 and Ogg Theora!? Why do you have to make it difficult? If I want to implement this tag I have to use THREE video formats to make sure it works in all browsers! Three! I may as well just stick with Flash since everyone will have the plugin for it anyway. It&#039;s very frustrating as a solo developer who is trying to maintain a site in his free time when a great new spec comes out and everyone want to have a pissing contest over codecs that ultimately just screws us, the developers.

Thanks Mozilla/Apple!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t you just provide support for BOTH Mpeg4 and Ogg Theora!? Why do you have to make it difficult? If I want to implement this tag I have to use THREE video formats to make sure it works in all browsers! Three! I may as well just stick with Flash since everyone will have the plugin for it anyway. It&#8217;s very frustrating as a solo developer who is trying to maintain a site in his free time when a great new spec comes out and everyone want to have a pissing contest over codecs that ultimately just screws us, the developers.</p>
<p>Thanks Mozilla/Apple!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>Laurentj: Thanks for your response!
Great with @poster, I missed this one when I last read the spec&#039; :-)
Yes, I knew about source to provide different versions (e.g. MP4/h264, Ogg/Theora), but in the case I want to provide two or more different qualities of the same container/codec, as far as I can see the first in the list will be played (I have not read in details), but there is apparently no simple way to specify the quality and/or to switch from one quality from the other. Probably that can be addressed partially by having some quality information in the &quot;codec&quot; part, and switch the order of the source elements in Javascript(?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurentj: Thanks for your response!<br />
Great with @poster, I missed this one when I last read the spec&#8217; :-)<br />
Yes, I knew about source to provide different versions (e.g. MP4/h264, Ogg/Theora), but in the case I want to provide two or more different qualities of the same container/codec, as far as I can see the first in the list will be played (I have not read in details), but there is apparently no simple way to specify the quality and/or to switch from one quality from the other. Probably that can be addressed partially by having some quality information in the &#8220;codec&#8221; part, and switch the order of the source elements in Javascript(?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henri Sivonen</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>Henri Sivonen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>The /&gt; syntax on the video element in text/html makes the rest of the page be swallowed into video fallback. There needs to be an explicit end tag in text/html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The /&gt; syntax on the video element in text/html makes the rest of the page be swallowed into video fallback. There needs to be an explicit end tag in text/html.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @sull</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>@sull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>nice article.  

btw, was just curious about the poster attribute and landed on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449156

any idea when this will be avail in an 3.5RC ?

thanks.

sull</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article.  </p>
<p>btw, was just curious about the poster attribute and landed on <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449156" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449156</a></p>
<p>any idea when this will be avail in an 3.5RC ?</p>
<p>thanks.</p>
<p>sull</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: video &#8211; more than just a tag at hacks.mozilla.org &#124; ScriptRemix.com Scripts</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>video &#8211; more than just a tag at hacks.mozilla.org &#124; ScriptRemix.com Scripts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>[...] More here:  video &#8211; more than just a tag at hacks.mozilla.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More here:  video &#8211; more than just a tag at hacks.mozilla.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms2ger</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms2ger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>Please, the syntax for boolean attributes is &#124;controls&#124;, &#124;controls=&quot;&quot;&#124; or &#124;controls=&quot;controls&quot;&#124;, not &#124;controls=&quot;true&quot;&#124;. (Also, you typo&#039;d &#124;width&#124; as &#124;with&#124; twice in the last example.)

@Alexandre: For the a thumbnail, there&#039;s the &#124;poster=&quot;&quot;&#124; attribute, but it isn&#039;t implemented yet in Firefox. Multiple versions could probably be done with multiple &#124;source&#124; element (&#124;&#124;), but that doesn&#039;t seem to be supported either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, the syntax for boolean attributes is |controls|, |controls=&#8221;"| or |controls=&#8221;controls&#8221;|, not |controls=&#8221;true&#8221;|. (Also, you typo&#8217;d |width| as |with| twice in the last example.)</p>
<p>@Alexandre: For the a thumbnail, there&#8217;s the |poster=&#8221;"| attribute, but it isn&#8217;t implemented yet in Firefox. Multiple versions could probably be done with multiple |source| element (||), but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be supported either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurentj</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurentj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>@alexandre :

&gt; It looks like there is no standard way to provide a few important information such as a thumbnail

No, there is such feature described by the html5 specification: the &quot;poster&quot; attribute, in which you can indicate an URL of an image. However this is not implemented in Firefox 3.5 (it will be in the next version).

http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#attr-video-poster

&gt;and another quality

Again, the specification allows it, with the source element http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-source-element

But it is not completely implemented in Firefox 3.5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@alexandre :</p>
<p>&gt; It looks like there is no standard way to provide a few important information such as a thumbnail</p>
<p>No, there is such feature described by the html5 specification: the &#8220;poster&#8221; attribute, in which you can indicate an URL of an image. However this is not implemented in Firefox 3.5 (it will be in the next version).</p>
<p><a href="http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#attr-video-poster" rel="nofollow">http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#attr-video-poster</a></p>
<p>&gt;and another quality</p>
<p>Again, the specification allows it, with the source element <a href="http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-source-element" rel="nofollow">http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-source-element</a></p>
<p>But it is not completely implemented in Firefox 3.5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>It looks like there is no standard way to provide a few important information such as a thumbnail (to be shown before the video is loaded/played), and another quality (e.g. switch normal/HD).
Yes, it is possible to do that with CSS/Javascript, but I think it would be nice to have a standard, semantically valid, accessible way to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like there is no standard way to provide a few important information such as a thumbnail (to be shown before the video is loaded/played), and another quality (e.g. switch normal/HD).<br />
Yes, it is possible to do that with CSS/Javascript, but I think it would be nice to have a standard, semantically valid, accessible way to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/07/video-more-than-just-a-tag/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=1313#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>Pretty extensive coverage.

Thank you, Paul!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty extensive coverage.</p>
<p>Thank you, Paul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

